Hi, In the example given on [1] where confmappingoverride is set to true
<dependency name="other-module" conf="conf1->other1;conf2->other2" /> when resolving conf2, is the result for other-module supposed to be the configuration other2, or the union of other1 and other2? This may be related to IVY-916, although in contrast to IVY-916 I don't think that "conf1->other1" should be omitted, but that mapping shouldn't apply when resolving conf2. -- Niklas Matthies [1] http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/trunk/ivyfile/configurations.html
