There's a new JIRA issue for this now: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1130
-- Niklas Matthies On Thu 2009-08-27 at 22:40h, Niklas Matthies wrote on ivy-user: > Hi, > > In the example given on [1] where confmappingoverride is set to true > > <dependency name="other-module" conf="conf1->other1;conf2->other2" /> > > when resolving conf2, is the result for other-module supposed to be > the configuration other2, or the union of other1 and other2? > > This may be related to IVY-916, although in contrast to IVY-916 I > don't think that "conf1->other1" should be omitted, but that mapping > shouldn't apply when resolving conf2. > > -- Niklas Matthies > > [1] http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/trunk/ivyfile/configurations.html
