Normally, you would specify a canonical schema location. This might
just be the name of the file or some official qualified
name. Usually, a URL is used, which sometimes actually points to a
location where the file can be downloaded. By hosting the file at a
live URL, users can use this canonical schema location and obtain the
schema as long as they have an Internet connection. On the other
hand, you can also provide a catalog to avoid unnecessary trips to
the server and avoid the requirement to be connected to the
Internet. So, you might do...
<uri name="http://www.myhost.com/schemas/a.xsd";
uri="file:///c:/svn/project/trunk/source/schemas/a.xsd"/>
If you always plan on using the catalog,
http://www.myhost.com/schemas/a.xsd doesn't even have to be a real
live host. It can be treated merely as a canonical schema location
identifier for the catalog to key upon.
Jake
At 06:08 AM 10/9/2007, you wrote:
>
>It looks like xjParse does what I need by specifying -S a.xsd -S b.xsd
>etc on the command line, so I do still have a "no code" solution :)
>
>The Xerces plugin for jEdit does also have the facility to import
>catalog files, would I be right in assuming I can write a catalog file,
>use that in jEdit, and with xjParse?
>
>Now I'm really confused with catalogs though!
>
>If my catalog has a
> <uri name="a.xsd"
>uri="file:///c:/svn/project/trunk/source/schemas/a.xsd"/>
>
>does it also need a
> <uri name="../a.xsd"
>uri="file:///c:/svn/project/trunk/source/schemas/a.xsd"/>
>
>for when the files included by b.xsd also include a? The relative path
>is correct but I don't know if I need an entry in the catalog?
>
>Michael Glavassevich wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>> If you're trying to avoid writing code to make this work you may want to
>> consider using a more schema centric command-line program like xjparse [1]
>> or jaxp.SourceValidator [2] instead of dom.Counter. With either of those
>> you can specify a list of schema documents to use for validation.
>> Additionally xjparse provides an option for specifying an XML Catalog [3]
>> for resolving the schema locations.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1] http://nwalsh.com/java/xjparse/
>> [2] http://xerces.apache.org/xerces2-j/samples-jaxp.html#SourceValidator
>> [3]
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/14809/xml-catalogs.html
>>
>> Michael Glavassevich
>> XML Parser Development
>> IBM Toronto Lab
>> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/08/2007 08:20:18 PM:
>>
>>
>>> I think there's a better way which I'll sketch (because my project
>>> uses a version of Xerces that is from before the DOM Level 3
>>> interfaces were included, so does something similar using older
>>> stuff).
>>>
>>> A standard XML parser may be associated with an EntityResolver, which
>>> supports a method taking a URI and returning an InputSource from which
>>> the content may be read. Similarly, when a reference to a schema
>>> namespace is found in a document (instance or schema) being read by a
>>> validating parser, some kind of resolver will be called, if one has
>>> been attached to the parser, to find the definition of the schema for
>>> that namespace. The namespace URI is the argument to the relevant
>>> method. This resolver thing (might be called LSResolver in the DOM
>>> Level 3 L&S) is an interface, and your implementation may do whatever
>>> it wants. Thus, you could create the resolver with some root location
>>> in the file system as argument, or you could use
>>> ClassLoader.getSystemResourceAsStream() or you could put the schemas
>>> in a database and retrieve their text from there. Your resolver could
>>> consult any schema locations it accumulated during its lifetime if you
>>> had a way to capture these, and wouldn't have to use them literally,
>>> but could interpret them as it wished.
>>>
>>> I suggest you consult the Xerces docs about how to install a resolver
>>> for schemas.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>> On 10/8/07, Chris Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Michael, I'm using Xerces-J 2.9.1, I even upgraded from 2.9.0 today to
>>>> test any changes!
>>>>
>>>> Jeff, can you bear with me here I think I understand you...
>>>>
>>>> Jeff Greif wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe an example will be clearer.
>>>>>
>>>>> The instance document is, relative to some subtree of the file
>>>>>
>> system, in
>>
>>>>> instances/articles/doc1.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a set of schemas that apply in
>>>>>
>>>>> schemas/{a,b,c,d}.xsd
>>>>>
>>>>> Suppose a.xsd imports b.xsd, and in addition, doc1.xml refers to
>>>>> components from nsa, the namespace of a, and nsb, the namespace of b.
>>>>>
>>>>> So there are schema locations of the form {nsa, ../../schemas/a.xsd
>>>>> nsb ../../schemas/b.xsd, ... }
>>>>>
>>>>> Now when the reference from doc1 -> nsb is found, the schema
>>>>>
>> locations
>>
>>>>> can be used to find b.xsd.
>>>>>
>>>> I'm with you up to here, because the schema locations were defined in
>>>> doc1.xml they are relative to doc1.xml and therefore point to the
>>>> correct xsd files.
>>>>
>>>> > If the reference from a.xsd -> nsb is
>>>>
>>>>> found, the schema locations will not work, because the location is
>>>>> incorrect relative to the location of a.xsd.
>>>>>
>>>> My reference from a.xsd -> nsb is in the form
>>>> <xsd:import namepsace="nsb" schemaLocation="./b.xsd" />
>>>> This path to b.xsd is correct with respect to the a.xsd it is defined
>>>>
>> in
>>
>>>> (although incorrect with respect to doc1.xml).
>>>>
>>>> However this schema location hint is second in the queue behind the one
>>>> specified in doc1.xml, when Xerces tries to use the one specified in
>>>> doc1.xml here it fails with File Not Found(because when relative to
>>>> a.xsd the doc1.xml's schema location is not valid), reports the error
>>>> and stops parsing so the schema location specified here is never used.
>>>>
>>>> Other parsers continue looking at the hints in schema location and find
>>>> the correct one specified on the <xsd:import> line, is there any way of
>>>> telling Xerces to try all hints matching that namespace (in the same
>>>>
>> way
>>
>>>> XMLSpy, Microsoft .NET's System.Xml and Saxonica seem to do) rather
>>>>
>> than
>>
>>>> stop on the first "not found"?
>>>>
>>>> > You couldn't solve the
>>>>
>>>>> problem by changing the schema locations to look like {nsa,
>>>>> ../../schemas/a.xsd nsb ./b.xsd, ... } because the doc1 -> nsb
>>>>> reference would fail. However, in the first case, if the parser is
>>>>> caching grammars, and the reference from doc1 -> nsb has already been
>>>>> processed, the a.xsd -> nsb reference might not be a validation error
>>>>> -- the schema locations are only a hint to the parser, and if it has
>>>>> located and parsed the right grammar already, it can use it.
>>>>>
>>>> So changing the schemaLocation works in my case because in processing
>>>> a.xsd the parser finds b.xsd (via the schemaLocation relative to a.xsd)
>>>> and caches it, therefore meaning it can use the cached copy in
>>>>
>> doc1.xml.
>>
>>>>> These are the problems with using relative URLs for the schema
>>>>> locations, except in certain special cases. For example, if the
>>>>> instance doc is
>>>>>
>>>>> instances/doc1.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> and the schemas are in
>>>>>
>>>>> schemas/{a,b,c,...}.xsd
>>>>>
>>>>> Then these schema locations: {nsa ../schemas/a.xsd nsb
>>>>> ../schemas/b.xsd ...} will work successfully, but only because the
>>>>> paths work whether the reference is from the instance doc or a schema
>>>>> doc.
>>>>>
>>>> Ideally I'd like to specify a "try all schema locations before error"
>>>>
>> or
>>
>>>> "do not stop on file not found error" property since there will
>>>>
>> *always*
>>
>>>> be one that works when used relative to the current location, is there
>>>>
>> a
>>
>>>> way of doing this?
>>>>
>>>> I'm guessing there is no "schema locations per file" property to turn
>>>> off the global cache of schema location and switch to a per-file cache?
>>>> Thus forcing Xerces to use the hint found at the current location.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the easiest way to solve my problem is to re-jig my document
>>>> locations so that the same relative path can be used to locate each of
>>>> the schemas? Not ideal mind since I've spent a long time developing the
>>>> inter-schema links to ensure they can always be linked together and I'd
>>>> like to use that investment in some way and I can't help but think that
>>>> moving the files so the relative paths fit for both scenarios is more
>>>>
>> of
>>
>>>> a by-product than something implemented by design.
>>>>
>>>> I'm under some commercial pressure here to switch to the method that
>>>> works with the system that the customers use (XMLSpy et al) but I'd
>>>> really like the same examples to work in Xerces-J, we've been extolling
>>>> the virtues of XML and XMLSchema as the "common language" to unify our
>>>> industry's data exchange and it'd look bad to have to change the
>>>> examples we are producing to make them work in different parsers!
>>>>
>>>> Once again, that ended up a lot longer than I expected and I hope it
>>>> makes sense, thanks for your time and patience.
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/8/07, Chris Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My comments inline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff Greif wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When a relative URL is used for the location of an imported schema,
>>>>>>>
>> it
>>
>>>>>>> is supposed to be relative to the URL of the importing document.
>>>>>>>
>> So
>>
>>>>>>> if your instance document directly references the namespaces of one
>>>>>>>
>> or
>>
>>>>>>> more schemas for validation, whose URLs are interpreted relative to
>>>>>>> the location of the instance document. Probably some of the
>>>>>>>
>> schemas
>>
>>>>>> So my instance document _should_ have relative paths to the
>>>>>>
>> individual
>>
>>>>>> schemas in it's schemaLocation?
>>>>>> Does the fact that Xerces is "changing" the base path to that of the
>>>>>> first specified schema for each subsequent schema constitute a bug?
>>>>>> Should I log this somewhere more formal?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> contain <xsd:import> elements; those would require URLs relative to
>>>>>>> the schema importing them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Each of those schemas then further includes others using
>>>>>>
>> <xsd:import>
>>
>>>>>> and <xsd:include> (for example core.xsd actually includes about 30
>>>>>>
>> or 40
>>
>>>>>> smaller schemas from ./Core/schemaname.xsd) and this works as I'd
>>>>>> expected it to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some of the schemas might be referenced both in the instance
>>>>>>>
>> document
>>
>>>>>>> and in imports from other schemas referenced in the instance
>>>>>>>
>> document.
>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure there's a specification of where they must be found
>>>>>>>
>> if
>>
>>>>>>> relative URLs are used. This may depend on the ordering of
>>>>>>>
>> processing
>>
>>>>>>> of those references by the parser/validator.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> When that is the case I am 100% sure that both the instance document
>>>>>>
>> and
>>
>>>>>> the "sub schemas" refer to the exact same document, so it shouldn't
>>>>>> matter which of the references Xerces is using, it will resolve to
>>>>>>
>> the
>>
>>>>>> same schema anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a section in the XML Schema 1.0 spec addressing this
>>>>>>>
>> issue.
>>
>>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/8/07, Chris Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Parshant,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changing the working dir of the JVM doesn't seem to make any
>>>>>>>>
>>> difference,
>>>
>>>>>>>> using dom.Counter from the Xerces-J samples the parser still seems
>>>>>>>>
>> to
>>
>>>>>>>> change the working dir first to wherever the xml file is located,
>>>>>>>>
>> then
>>
>>>>>>>> to wherever the first xsd file specified is located and need all
>>>>>>>> subsequent locations to be relative to that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Absolute paths work fine but I'm trying to include these files
>>>>>>>>
>> bundled
>>
>>>>>>>> in with a set of schema as examples of how to use the format,
>>>>>>>>
>> hence I
>>
>>>>>>>> don't know where my users will unzip the archives to (C:
>>>>>>>>
>>> \Users\username,
>>>
>>>>>>>> c:\projects\projectname\, /usr/local/projects, /home etc) so
>>>>>>>>
>>> I can't set
>>>
>>>>>>>> absolute paths in my distributed files.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was hoping to not need to actually write my own parsing program,
>>>>>>>>
>> just
>>
>>>>>>>> use the output from dom.Counter and a schemaLocation hint
>>>>>>>>
>>> (which fits my
>>>
>>>>>>>> needs perfectly) since I'm not really a Java developer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I saw that jEdit page but I'd rather make my schemas
>>>>>>>>
>> validateagainst a
>>
>>>>>>>> standard Xerces installation than modify my jEdit installation to
>>>>>>>>
>> make
>>
>>>>>>>> them work, I feel this would be more useful for my users.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prashant Reddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think the relative paths you have specified in the
>>>>>>>>>
>>> schemaLocation will
>>>
>>>>>>>>> be resolved against the "working dir". The working dir is usually
>>>>>>>>>
>> the
>>
>>>>>>>>> directory at the cmd prompt when you launched the JVM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have you tried giving absolute path to the XSD files ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A more portable solution to finding schema files locally is to
>>>>>>>>>
>> use
>>
>>>>>>>>> EntityResolver[1].
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you are using JAXP 1.3/ JDK 1.5+ see :
>>>>>>>>> https://jaxp.dev.java.net/article/jaxp-1_3-article.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]:http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.
>>>>>>>>>
>>> 0/docs/api/org/xml/sax/EntityResolver.html
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hope this helps.
>>>>>>>>> -Prashant
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 13:17 +0100, Chris Bray wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please go easy on me as I'm a newbie here, if this is a
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> really obvious
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> problem I'm really sorry!
>>>>>>>>>> I've been using Xerces to validate XML for a while now, and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> I've found a
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> troublesome scenario.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In the top of my xml files I have a line specifying the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> location of the
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> external schemas required for this xml file like so:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.diggsml.org/0.9.2
>>>>>>>>>> ../Schemas/diggs/core.xsd http://www.diggsml.org/0.9.2
>>>>>>>>>>
>> /geotechnical
>>
>>>>>>>>>> ../Schemas/diggs/geotechnical.xsd "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In this case specifying two namespaces and their associated
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> schema files
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (files exist and paths are correct).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However this doesn't work using Xerces. I am required to change
>>>>>>>>>>
>> my
>>
>>>>>>>>>> schemaLocation attribute so that the first path points to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> its xsd, then
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> subsequent entries are relative to that first xsd, not to the
>>>>>>>>>>
>> current
>>
>>>>>>>>>> file, like so:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation=" http://www.diggsml.org/0.9.2
>>>>>>>>>> ../Schemas/diggs/core.xsd http://www.diggsml.org/0.9.2
>>>>>>>>>>
>> /geotechnical
>>
>>>>>>>>>> ../geotechnical.xsd "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there any way I can change this to work like the first
>>>>>>>>>>
>> example, as
>>
>>>>>>>>>> other parsers (XMLSpy and Stylus Studio in particular)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> require the first
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> syntax, all paths relative to current doc, what I believe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> to be correct
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> behaviour. I don't know how to build Xerces-J from source
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> to fix(?) this
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> myself but I'd be willing to try if anyone can help me get
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> it building.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Since my customers are all using XMLSpy etc I'm having to
>>>>>>>>>>
>> produce my
>>
>>>>>>>>>> example files in the earlier syntax, stopping my from
>>>>>>>>>>
>> usingXerces to
>>
>>>>>>>>>> validate them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As the biggest advocate of Free/OpenSource software in our
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> group (jEdit
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> with Xerces plugin in particular) I really don't want to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> have to change
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> to use XMLSpy or Stylus Studio but this is quite awkward for me!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That ended up being a longer mail than I'd expected! I hope you
>>>>>>>>>>
>> can
>>
>>>>>>>>>> help, if there's any more information you need (or a small
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> set of sample
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> files) let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Chris Bray
>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer (DIGGS Project)
>>>>>>>>>> Keynetix Lt.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
