Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Object Pooling Package

[Craig R. McClanahan]

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> The keyword here is "standard": if this proposal is for creating a thread
> pool standard, I'm -1 on it ( for many reasons ). Just creating some
> interfaces doesn't make it a "standard".
> 

According to the guidelines, it's not a problem to have different
implementations of possibly overlapping functionality -- so the "standard"
being created by these interfaces only belong to implementations that
choose to use it.

You are welcome to propose a different approach.

> 
> Costin
> 

Craig