This is a cool utility class, and a good thing, so I'm all for it.
How about checking into the sandbox, we can work on basic docs and
packaging, and then bring it to a full vote when it's organized a bit
for people to see?
geir
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a Configuration class that is the amalgamation of some
> classes that were originally present in JServ. After a bit of
> work this class is now used in Velocity and Turbine, and I believe
> a variant is still being used in Cocoon though I'm not sure.
>
> I think this class might be a nice properties type configuration
> counterpart to the XML type configuration tools that are either
> already in the commons are heading there. The XML digester code
> from Catalina? Not totally sure on that one.
>
> At any rate I would like to see if it would be possible to move
> the Configuration class that is currently in Velocity to the
> commons. Rigth now there is an ugly import in a lot of the Turbine
> code and using Turbine _requires_ the velocity jar because I
> didn't want to copy the class over into the Turbine tree.
>
> I have to admit that I haven't stayed on top of the commons
> lineage so I'm not really sure how I go about proposing the
> movement of the Configuration class to the commons other
> then asking here.
>
> Could someone point me in the right direction?
>
> --
> jvz.
>
> Jason van Zyl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
> http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
> http://tambora.zenplex.org
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
