on 8/12/01 7:20 PM, "Kevin Seguin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fwiw, when i run your test using a base-64 implemention that i use, i get > the same result as you get with the commons Base64. that is: > > NWoZK3kTsExUV00Ywo1G5jlUKKs= Ok...cool...it must have been a buggy implementation that we were using (I can't remember now which one it was...)... Thanks for taking the time to do the validation. -jon
- Base64 from commons-util Jon Stevens
- RE: Base64 from commons-util Kevin Seguin
- Jon Stevens