--- Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just noted that target is used as intermediate directory name. As
> this
> doesn't conflict with any existing "standards" - what do you think of
> making
> that the standard for jakarta. I can approach avalon/james/ant people
> to
> change it to target ... thoughts?
Though I have no binding vote, I prefer "build" over "target". After,
all "build" is what you are doing.
If we want to standardize (and I do think that is a good idea), I
suggest that a "poll" be taken of all the Jakarta projects, and the
naming convention most widely used be adopted by the rest. This seems
to be the "democratic" means (as each project/subproject casts one
"vote").
Lance
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
