> > > +1. My intention to do this would be to have an httpclient that
> > > works in Slide without changing Slide at all. This is also
> > > assuming that the Slide developers would help to support/maintain
> > > the 1.0 release and branch. Remy, would you be willing to support
this?
> >
> > Yes, that is the plan.
> >
> > Also, developement of 2.0 should happen in the sandbox, and should move
to
> > the commons when its API is stable (and of course when it's voted upon).
> >
>
> -1
>
> I don't agree with that. Development of 2.0 should happen on the main
branch
> of commons-httpclient in commons. From what you say any new version of any
> commons component should go back to the sandbox as it is not stable ... :(
This is not legal. Rodney's refactoring was never voted upon.
Stable != released here. Stable means the API won't change in any
significant way.
So in that case, I don't agree with the proposal either, which doesn't
comply with the Jakarta bylaws.
Remy
