Vincent Massol wrote on 8/28/01 10:40 am:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Remy Maucherat"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <jakarta-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>rg>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28,
>2001 4:19 PM
>Subject: Re:
>[httpclient][VOTE] going
>forward
>
>
>> > +1. My intention to do
>this would be to have an
>httpclient that
>> > works in Slide without
>changing Slide at all. This is
>also
>> > assuming that the Slide
>developers would help to
>support/maintain
>> > the 1.0 release and
>branch. Remy, would you be
>willing to support this?
>>
>> Yes, that is the plan.
>>
>> Also, developement of 2.0
>should happen in the
>sandbox, and should move to
>the commons when its API is
>stable (and of course when
>it's voted upon).
>>
>
>-1
>
>I don't agree with that.
>Development of 2.0 should
>happen on the main branch
>of commons-httpclient in
>commons. From what you
>say any new version of any
>commons component should
>go back to the sandbox as it
>is not stable ... :(
>
>> Remy
>-Vincent
I agree. All development should occur on branches of the main tree, in order to
preserve the revision history and facilitate merging.
- Morgan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
