On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: > Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 19:18:43 +0100 > From: robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (Digester) Rules implementation conflict > > the javadoc comment for Rules.match states that an empty list must be > returned if there are no matches. > RulesBase will (usually) return null instead. > We should follow the Javadocs -- just checked in a patch to do this (and make Digester do the right thing under either circumstance). > which is the correct behaviour? > > - robert > Craig
- Re: Reusable Digester? Matt Cleveland
- Re: Reusable Digester? robert burrell donkin
- RSSDigester / org.apache.commons.digester.rss Ted Husted
- Re: RSSDigester / org.apache.commons.digest... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: RSSDigester / org.apache.commons.di... Ted Husted
- Re: RSSDigester / org.apache.common... robert burrell donkin
- Re: RSSDigester / org.apache.c... Ted Husted
- Re: RSSDigester / org.apac... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: RSSDigester / org.apac... Ted Husted
- (Digester) Rules implementation con... robert burrell donkin
- Re: (Digester) Rules implement... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: (Digester) Rules imple... robert burrell donkin
- Re: (Digester) Rules imple... robert burrell donkin
- Re: Digester help with Gump Sam Ruby