Sebastien Lelong wrote:
>> I haven't checked all, but what I saw was good!
>> It's now the responsibility of the author (or adapter) of the lib to
>> provide a good format, and that's the way it should to my opinion!
>
>
> One important thing... About the Description: field, you (we all) have to
> not indent the content. I mean:
>
> Description: blabla
> blabla
> blabla
>
> is bad.
>
> Description: blabla
> blabla
> blabla
>
> is good.
>
I see what you mean. An alternative could be to leave the line with
'Description:' empty, like:
-- Description:
-- blabla
-- blabla
If you keep the leading blanks the formatting of the author would remain
in tact.
Regards, Rob.
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
