Sebastien Lelong wrote: >> I haven't checked all, but what I saw was good! >> It's now the responsibility of the author (or adapter) of the lib to >> provide a good format, and that's the way it should to my opinion! > > > One important thing... About the Description: field, you (we all) have to > not indent the content. I mean: > > Description: blabla > blabla > blabla > > is bad. > > Description: blabla > blabla > blabla > > is good. > > I cannot know (and wouldn't want, actually...), while parsing the file, if > these spaces have to be kept, or are for indent. The fact is, since the > script only takes the content, that is removes the "Description:" text, it > can produce weird results. But that's what the author provived, right ?... > > See for example (randomly picked :)) > > * > http://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/unvalidated/doc/html/serial_hw_int_cts.html > * > http://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/unvalidated/doc/html/lcd_hd44780_4.html > > Seb
Interesting! These html pages show up in print preview as more then one page doc's. No need to select and print selection. Good!! Was the addition of 'pre', mentioned back a few messages, the fix? Looks real good anyway, now. Wayne --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
