Joep,
While browsing the hd44780 libs .... I see and inconsistency: the old libs use for 0-base line numbers, while (parts of) Richards use 1-base. Should be corrected! I believe we agreed to make 0-base the standard, because that matches the compilers array-indexing JalV2. If not it is my proposal to use only 0-base. I see that lcd_clear_line() accepts only lines 1 en 2. That should become 0,1,2 en 3, and the body of the proc should be adapted. I don't understand the '39' in the for-loop, I would expect 40. And it should not be a hard coded digit, but LCD_CHARS. Why are the 'pragma inline' statements commented out? I thought the compiler problems with 'inline' were solved, weren't they? Groeten, Rob. PS: I've committed my mods. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
