2009/2/28 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: >> > "project" follows what's already there: everything in singular. You're right: singular it is.
> By extend, there could be many, many things. Which is good. But... remember > this is under our SVN. Only jallib committers can upload their code. I think > this kind of projects concern a larger public, I mean lots of people can > share their work, far easier than building libraries. If many should go > there (which is good, again), we may need to give access to SVN for lots of > people. I wonder if this is good ! (this is a real question, I've no > definitive answer here) Access to lots of people is not good. And I see your point: it should be more then just a project with jallib. And there should probably an other place for 'just projects'. And there will always be a grey area, So what kind of projects? - projects that --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
