2009/3/18 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>: > Yes, these things are quite expensive, widely used. I've read lots of things > showing how fragile they are (read: not fool-proof) and still show very low > and unreliable performances. I hope my MaxBotix US ranger will better (I > know it will). Well, robotics sensors are generally 'noisy' and it is a (the) major chalange to cope with that... I have some of the analog sharp sensors and an i2c compass and US ranger. I thought about creating libraries for them, but there is little to add over analog and i2c libs... The only added value would be a generic interface for different sensors. But lcd learned me that this requires a lot of work and I doubt it would be worth while (if it is even used at all).
If only we knew who is using jallib, which libs are used most often and (most dificult since people tend not to know this them selfs) what new features would be most usefull for them... Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
