Comment #4 on issue 92 by robhamerling: 'high' and 'low' resolution in pwm libraries http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=92
We could keep the current unqualified pwmx_set_dutycycle(byte in duty) and let it work unchanged, and add a procedure pwmx_set_dutycycle_lowres(byte in duty) which sets low resolution mode but with higher precision than the unqualified procedure. See the proposed change in my comment #3. This will prevent compatibility issues and the new procedure provides a higher precision duty cycle setting with an 8 bits argument. The documentation of the different procedures must clearly (more than now) show what the differences are. There should not be any misunderstanding about precision and resolution. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
