On 9/1/09, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All, Enzo, > > I finaly took the time to search for you files and found them in my > spambox... > > This simulation looks good. I am an old fashion guy who test everyting > on real hardware, but have to change this one day.... > > Vasile has created an updated version of this lib. > > - he added more characters. > > - he claims it is smaller. > Has anyone verified this? I don't know how it could be smaller, but > will look into this when nobody else has). > > - he removed the inversion of the table. > I expect this makes the library smaller and simpler, but the > resulting code a bit larger and slower, since the inversion is done > runtime and not compiletime (and that's why I put it it the way I > did). What would be the best way to implement this - compiletime or > runtime?
OK, now I have understood your point. I will check it tomorrow for both runtime and compile time... BTW, how do you know if indeed it's run time or compile time? thx, Vasile --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
