On 9/1/09, vasile surducan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 9/1/09, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi All, Enzo, >> >> I finaly took the time to search for you files and found them in my >> spambox... >> >> This simulation looks good. I am an old fashion guy who test everyting >> on real hardware, but have to change this one day.... >> >> Vasile has created an updated version of this lib. >> >> - he added more characters. >> >> - he claims it is smaller. >> Has anyone verified this? I don't know how it could be smaller, but >> will look into this when nobody else has). >> >> - he removed the inversion of the table. >> I expect this makes the library smaller and simpler, but the >> resulting code a bit larger and slower, since the inversion is done >> runtime and not compiletime (and that's why I put it it the way I >> did). What would be the best way to implement this - compiletime or >> runtime? > > > OK, now I have understood your point. I will check it tomorrow for both > runtime and compile time... BTW, how do you know if indeed it's run time or > compile time? > > thx, > Vasile >
seven_segment: code area: 348 data area: 9 hardware stack: 1 of 8 seven_segment_m code area: 356 data area: 9 hardware stack: 1 of 8 ok, compile time it's better. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
