Greetings Kyle, On May 20, 4:56 pm, "Kyle" <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings, > > This is probably a silly question -- but why did you all choose to create your > own bnf/parser instead of just replacing the backend in the existing compiler? >
First - let me again thank you for JALV2 - it is very good, and I use it nearly every day on 18F devices, and I plan to continue using JALV2 and adding libraries to JALLIB for the foreseeable future. We did ask if you were willing to put your JALV2 source code up in a convenient place so that we could all work with the code, but you declined, which is fine. Furthermore, you made it clear that you didn't want others modifying your code. Again, this is fine. But speaking for myself, I didn't relish the idea of trying to maintain a new back-end to JALV2, without your support. I've done diffs of JALV2 source code for the past year or so, and the changes are significant with each release. Again, this is fine. If you one day decide to add similar support to your JALV2 compiler for other chips, then I suspect this project will become obsolete. Until then, it is a fun activity. William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
