Hi Matt, 2010/8/21 mattschinkel <[email protected]>: > There does not need to be a "jallib-alike effort for each target > family". If you mean there are a dozen libraries that are not device-specific, then you're right. And if you mean jallib supports over 300 devices and most other families are smaller, you're right too. And since we are more experienced now, we can probably work more efficient and it takes only half the effort.
> I'm sure libraries and samples for other devices will be > welcome here. I am not arguing it should be separate, on the contrary. My statement is it will take a lot of effort, maybe more than many of us are aware of, and much of which is executed by Rob. Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
