It will obviously take some time, but that is still better then never :) Matt.
On Aug 21, 10:40 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > 2010/8/21 mattschinkel <[email protected]>:> There does not need to be > a "jallib-alike effort for each target > > family". > > If you mean there are a dozen libraries that are not device-specific, > then you're right. And if you mean jallib supports over 300 devices > and most other families are smaller, you're right too. And since we > are more experienced now, we can probably work more efficient and it > takes only half the effort. > > > I'm sure libraries and samples for other devices will be > > welcome here. > > I am not arguing it should be separate, on the contrary. My statement > is it will take a lot of effort, maybe more than many of us are aware > of, and much of which is executed by Rob. > > Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
