ds18b20 is a sandwich. Is inspired by Bert's example and some example
from AndTech, arranged in layers and seasoned by me, as I thought it
can be more pleasant for the clients...

On Jan 13, 9:37 pm, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, this is the same for both one wire andds18b20then?
>
> Joep
>
> 2011/1/13 funlw65(Vasi) <[email protected]>:
>
> > Vasile was the first author of one wire interface, Marchaudon adapted
> > it for Jalv2, as stated by Bert in the header of the file included in
> > his package.
>
> > On Jan 13, 7:52 pm, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> And an other question: who is the orignal (first) author of:
> >> -- 1 wire JAL library for theDS18B20
> >> --
> >> -- file      :ds18b20.jal
> >> -- authors    : And-Tech.pl, Bert van Dam, Jean Marchaudon, Olivier Seitz
> >> --            : Vasile Surducan
>
> >> Joep
>
> >> 2011/1/13 Joep Suijs <[email protected]>:
>
> >> > Hi Vasi,
>
> >> > Can you confirm that thermometer.jal is intended for a single device
> >> > on the 1wire bus and thermometer2.jal potentially supports more
> >> > devices?
> >> > If so, it is probably best to start a test file with thermometer that
> >> > shows the use of all the relevant functions of the lib. There are
> >> > quite a few procedures and there function is 'quite briefly'
> >> > documented and not shown in the samples. And the ones that are used,
> >> > have no explanation (in contrast to the lcd use ;). So some work to
> >> > do.
>
> >> > An other thing is the parameter max_crc_errors. I think this is the
> >> > maximum number of retries. Correct?
> >> > Such a parameter suggests crc errors are quite common. How often do
> >> > you get CRC errors? Also, does it make sense to pass this as a
> >> > parameter? If it is a fixed value, we could add a constant. But when
> >> > there is a limited number of retries, there remains a chance that get
> >> > invalid reading back. And how would you act upon this? Maybe it makes
> >> > more sense to have a constant that either says unlimited retries or no
> >> > (automatic) retries at all, but return a succes indicator. If your
> >> > program has to handle the error, it will probably has some retry
> >> > mechanism anyway. Or do I miss something?
>
> >> > Once the first test-file is done,  it would be good to create a second
> >> > one to show the use of multiple devices on the bus. Are you able to
> >> > create a program (like termometer2) which works with two (or more)
> >> > devices on the same bus? Does the library support discovery of devices
> >> > on such a bus or should one first determine the ID of each device when
> >> > they are alone?
>
> >> > Joep
>
> >> > 2011/1/13 Joep Suijs <[email protected]>:
> >> >> Hi Vasi,
>
> >> >> I start working on it but had not much time. With a bit of luck, I can
> >> >> spend a few hours tonight and probably send you some questions.
> >> >> For now, I am okay ;)
>
> >> >> Joep
>
> >> >> 2011/1/13 funlw65(Vasi) <[email protected]>:
> >> >>> I don't compiled using SVN version.
> >> >>> For the file 18f2550_ds18b20_therm.jal I have:
>
> >> >>> jal 2.4n (compiled Jun  2 2010)
> >> >>> 0 errors, 0 warnings
> >> >>> Code area: 2294 of 32768 used (bytes)
> >> >>> Data area: 81 of 928 used
> >> >>> Software stack available: 847 bytes
> >> >>> Hardware stack depth 5 of 31
>
> >> >>> and for the file 18f2550_ds18b20_therm2.jal I have:
> >> >>> jal 2.4n (compiled Jun  2 2010)
> >> >>> 0 errors, 0 warnings
> >> >>> Code area: 2104 of 32768 used (bytes)
> >> >>> Data area: 80 of 928 used
> >> >>> Software stack available: 848 bytes
> >> >>> Hardware stack depth 5 of 31
>
> >> >>> On Jan 13, 11:03 am, "funlw65(Vasi)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>> Hi Joep,
>
> >> >>>> I think I did not touched 1_wire.jal, is as it is from Bert package...
>
> >> >>>> I compared them with Winmerge: I added a line in comments and better
> >> >>>> arranged two if structure, without touching the code logic.
>
> >> >>>> Vasi
>
> >> >>>> On Jan 12, 6:04 pm, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> >>>> > Vasi,
>
> >> >>>> > If fixed part of the problem: the garbage in the files came either
> >> >>>> > from gmail or Microsoft :(
> >> >>>> > Only the pragma issue remains. I don't understand why, but this is 
> >> >>>> > not
> >> >>>> > relevant since I'll move it to a board file anyway.
> >> >>>> > Just to be certain: I have the 18-8 version of 1wire.jal. Is this 
> >> >>>> > the
> >> >>>> > correct one?
>
> >> >>>> > Thanks,
> >> >>>> > Joep
>
> >> >>>> > 2011/1/12 Joep Suijs <[email protected]>:
>
> >> >>>> > > Hi Vasi,
>
> >> >>>> > > In your 15-12 version, 1_wire.jal is missing. When I grab the one 
> >> >>>> > > you
> >> >>>> > > original posted and try to compile it I get:
>
> >> >>>> > > jal 2.4n (compiled Jun  2 2010)
> >> >>>> > > generating p-code
> >> >>>> > > 18f2550_ds18b20_therm2.jal:17: unknown pragma target: voltage 
> >> >>>> > > pragma
> >> >>>> > > 18f2550_ds18b20_therm2.jal:21: unknown pragma target: ccp2mux 
> >> >>>> > > pragma
> >> >>>> > > 1_wire.jal:95: "x" not defined
> >> >>>> > > 1_wire.jal:96: unexpected token: "end"
> >> >>>> > >ds18b20.jal:248: "t" not defined
> >> >>>> > >ds18b20.jal:248: unexpected token: "t"
> >> >>>> > > 18f2550_ds18b20_therm2.jal:134: unexpected token: ""e""
> >> >>>> > > 7 errors, 0 warnings
>
> >> >>>> > > It seems that all three files have issue's. E.g. in the crc 
> >> >>>> > > routine of
> >> >>>> > >ds18b20, line 248 is "t tmp_1_7 shared at tmp[1] : 7", which is not
> >> >>>> > > valid JAL. Also there are some fuse-related messages.
> >> >>>> > > Are you compiling against the svn version of jallib? And can you 
> >> >>>> > > post
> >> >>>> > > a compilable set of files?
>
> >> >>>> > > Thanks,
> >> >>>> > > Joep
> >> >>>> > > 2011/1/12 funlw65(Vasi) <[email protected]>:
> >> >>>> > >> Can't wait to see the result :)
>
> >> >>>> > >> On Jan 12, 9:30 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>> > >>> Hi Vasi,
>
> >> >>>> > >>> Thanks for you work. I will start working on this library set 
> >> >>>> > >>> (I have
> >> >>>> > >>> the chips now ;)
>
> >> >>>> > >>> Joep
>
> >> >>>> > >>> 2011/1/11 funlw65(Vasi) <[email protected]>:
>
> >> >>>> > >>> > Thank you very much.
> >> >>>> > >>> > Joep, all three authors agree with the change of license for 
> >> >>>> > >>> > inclusion
> >> >>>> > >>> > in Jallib.
>
> >> >>>> > >>> > Vasi
>
> >> >>>> > >>> > On Jan 11, 11:07 pm, "jfm68" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>> > >>> >> hi,
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> for me, it's ok .
> >> >>>> > >>> >> this part my work is completely free, you can use and reuse 
> >> >>>> > >>> >> it.
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> jean Marchaudon
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >>>> > >>> >> From: "funlw65(Vasi)" <[email protected]>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> To: "jallib" <[email protected]>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 9:41 AM
> >> >>>> > >>> >> Subject: [jallib] Re: One wire library
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> Ok, I will contact them.
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> On Jan 11, 9:32 am, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > Hi Vasi,
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > > If I remember well, Marchaudon said it
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > > is ok. Remains Vasile and Bert.
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > To change the license, I'd like to have the conformation 
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > from all
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > three. Will you look into this?
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > The license need to be changed to add the library to 
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > jallib.
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> > Joep
>
> >> >>>> > >>> >> --
> >> >>>> > >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> >>>> > >>> >> Google Groups
> >> >>>> > >>> >> "jallib" group.
> >> >>>> > >>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> >>>> > >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >>>> > >>> >> [email protected].
> >> >>>> > >>> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> >>>> > >>> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>
> >> >>>> > >>> > --
> >> >>>> > >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> >>>> > >>> > Google Groups "jallib" group.
> >> >>>> > >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> >>>> > >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> >>>> > >>> > [email protected].
> >> >>>> > >>> > For more options, visit this group 
> >> >>>> > >>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>
> >> >>>> > >> --
> >> >>>> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> >> >>>> > >> Google Groups "jallib" group.
> >> >>>> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> >>>> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> >>>> > >> [email protected].
> >> >>>> > >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> >>>> > >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> >>> Groups "jallib" group.
> >> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> >>> [email protected].
> >> >>> For more options, visit this group 
> >> >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "jallib" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to