Hi Seb, On May 6, 6:56 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following scenario makes > sense: what if someone wants to use MCP2515 device, using can_mcp2515.jal > library, on MSSP2 module, or on SPI software ? Current implementation > directly use spi_master_hw pseudo-var, and would require usage of > intermediate aliases (eg. alias spi_master is spi_master_hw). Will we be > able to modify this ? Another question I'm asking...
This sounds very interesting, since supporting mssp2 is an actual improvement/ new feature. But only if it is tested with real hardware -- re-test the old samples, and create a new sample that uses mssp2. Be sure to add 'adapted-by'. William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
