Hi Seb, On May 6, 11:43 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> wrote: > > in order to avoid duplication of code, > we refactored the setting mode code into an other procedure, while calling > it within new init procedure. >
So far as I can determine, this is the very first time you actually explained why you rewrote spi_init() -- 'to avoid duplication of code'. But does it really? I may look more pleasing (to you) in the source file, but had you left it as the original, I would be much happier. And I wonder how much, if any, your version saves actual code space in flash? Remember you must include the overhead of calling/returning the new function, unless you decide to inline it. William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
