2011/5/6 Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> > > I have another option to offer. Actually, to re-offer since you didn't want > to reply to it previously. Here we go again: you want to use a specific > version of spi_master_hw.jal, why don't you stick to a specific revision for > this file (ie. r2585) ? When you get time and when you want, you'll be able > to test the new version and finally upgrade your revision number to the one > you recently tested. Please reply on this point. >
William, you didn't reply about sticking to a certain SVN revision. I think this is a serious option considering your "freezing" approach. I hope you'll find time to reply to this important point. > I'll ask Matt's question again here: when a new compiler is released, how > do you manage this important change ? Do you ask Kyle not to change his > compiler because you put a lot of time and energy of testing your programs > and you don't want to re-test them ? > > Another important question: you may have noticed device files are evolving. > Don't you feel you have to test your program again when new device files are > release ? How do you manage this important change too ? > And also, please reply to this *two* previous points (new compiler and new device file release). Cheers, Seb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
