Hi > LOL Yeah, because no one could agree how to expose fine-grained logging in > the Mailet API. :-) One of these days, I'm sure it will be revisited.
Agree, let's do so: I will provide patches and difs for logging. When we can review this and put it to the scratch (or whatever cvs) branch. So ones who badly need fine grained logging in mailet (like me for example) will be able to take it and test it. This change doesn't break mailet API, it just extend it a little bit, so there should be NO compatibility risk. After testing (and time) this can go into main code. And when new mailet API will be developed this change can be adopted or dropped out but still this will be done when there is at least one implemented and tested approach. Andrei > > > Heh, I would like to add to this logging levels for mailets, but this is > > totally another story ;-). I am just recalling broken lances over mailet > > logging :-( ...to no avail. > > LOL Yeah, because no one could agree how to expose fine-grained logging in > the Mailet API. :-) One of these days, I'm sure it will be revisited. > > --- Noel > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
