On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 14:27:41 -0400, Danny Angus wrote: >> Not that my opinon should matter much, but I'm -1 unless the test cases >> go with it and can run (I'll help as much as my abillities allow). I >> consider them absolutely crucial to having a solid standards-compliant >> implementation. > > I would be +1 to have experimental IMAP in the head if.. > > 1/ it was being actively developed > 2/ it provided some basic functionality, not necessarily compliance or > 100% of anything. > 3/ was "off" by default in release builds. > > I think 1 & 3 are so, so my remaining objection is only 2, which Sacha > believes is acchieved > >> Currently it does not work with either IMAP client I have access to >> Mozilla or Ximian. >
I think for the purpose of ensuring that we're compatible with actual IMAP and not "MSIMAP" (probably a tm) having Mozilla or Eudora, etc should be the guiding principal for judging this. This is however far less important to me than the unit tests issue. I think they are essential to a high quality IMAP implementation and I'm not apt to waste my time creating low quality anything. -Andy > No, me either. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
