Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Danny Angus wrote: > >>> If you copy the files out of the proposals directory and inside the main >>> directory and upgrade the needed files that are redundant with the main >>> trunk, it will be full functional. (After that compile James as like >>> without IMAP). Currently Ive tested with Outlook and Outlook Express >>> with no bigger problems, so you can test all of the features. >> >> >> >> Sascha, >> >> If I compile James with IMAP will James be exactly the same in >> operation if >> I don't enable IMAP, than James without IMAP compiled in? >> >> If the answer is yes, and I can make it work with at least one IMAP >> client >> then I'd be prepared to vote in favour of moving it back into the HEAD. > > > Not that my opinon should matter much,
The opinion of anyone who is making a constructive contribution to the topic matters. > but I'm -1 unless the test cases > go with it and can run (I'll help as much as my abillities allow). I > consider them absolutely crucial to having a solid standards-compliant > implementation. Are there test cases that don't run now, or are you worried that moving it to the src dir will cause test cases to fail? (If the latter, why?). Charles -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
