Noel J. Bergman wrote:
2) Is there a reason why fetchpop does a send instead of a store?
Absolutely. Doing a store would bypass the James pipeline. Doing the send
puts the message through local message processing. This is considered
desirable. An argument could be made for it being a configuration option.
IMHO, absolutely not... if you want to put it at the top of the
pipeline, put it in the root repository, which is always the top of the
spool for local message processing. The only reason I can think to not
specify via repository is if you don't want to have fetchpop know where
that repository is (I suppose somewhat of use, but even still doesn't
seem that critical).
3) Is anyone else working on something like this or interested in this
at all?
I think that there would be considerable interest, especially since your
version now allows us to integrate yahoo and hotmail, amongst other things,
into James.
Yeah, the Yahoo! mail javamail implementation is pretty cool.
Sounds like it would be good to see your code.
--
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
