Simon,
Well, I'll be back in my office on Wed., and will certainly take some time
to look at this issue. I have not been able to reproduce this on linux, so
far, using james-cvs and mysql. If necessary, perhaps I'll add some
additional instrumentation to the pop3handler code, and make a build
available for those of you having this problem to try.
We'd certainly like to correct any issues, but at the moment none of the
developers seem to be able to able to reproduce this problem, and no one who
can reproduce it has been able or willing to help diagnose it.
This performance issue and a socket timeout issue effecting one user are the
two outstanding reports. In the latter case, Peter Goldstein seems to be
running with exactly the same James config and platform, and cannot
reproduce the results. He's been working directly with that person to help
correct whatever is causing it.
I have not been able to reproduce this performance issue using [Sun 1.3.0,
IBM 1.3.1, Sun JDK 1.4.1] with any recent version of MySQL v3 and either of
the Connector/J drivers (v2 is included with James, and I've also been
testing with Connector/J v3).
The next release is due out RSN, and there should be a milestone coming up
ASAP, but I'd consider this a bug fix, so if we can find something we ought
to be able to get a fix into the release. Assuming that it is a code issue,
and not just some odd configuration issue that needs to be documented.
--- Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: simon [mailto:simon@;sydneybluegum.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:38
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: Do you feel James POP server very slow?
Noel,
Having the same problem - I takes 4 minutes to get a 1.5 meg msg.
got the james.sar dated 24-Sep-2002 from the download area
added postgresql jdbc and am running as a service and i think i used the
server option.
JDK1.4.1 Win2000 Postgresql
>From my tomcat web server using the same jdbc it takes only 5 second to
display the complete message.
About 10 seconds from another ISPs mail server.
How long before the next release?
Do you have any suggestions that would be worth trying?
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>Kaleb,
>
>I'm running James on linux with both IBM JDK 1.3.1 and Sun JDK 1.4.1. Not
>seeing any such problem. Would be very interested in seeing results.
>
>IIRC (I'm typing this reply while riding in a car), the fix corrected the
>log message output to indicate where any delay might occur. Before the
fix,
>the log could be misleading.
>
> --- Noel
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kaleb Axon [mailto:dontspam_kaleb@;axon-family.net]
>Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:06
>To: James Users List
>Subject: Re: Do you feel James POP server very slow?
>
>This sounds like it might be the same problem I've been having. They tried
>a fix but it didn't work. I hadn't reported back to them because I was
>waiting until I would have time for further debugging efforts. Hey, maybe
>between the two of us they'll be able to gather enough info to figure out
>what's going on? (-:
>
>I wonder if JDK 1.4 would work better? Which version are the developers
>using?
>
>Kaleb
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "yadan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:24 PM
>Subject: Do you feel James POP server very slow?
>
>I'm using James2.0a3,JDK1.3.1_04,Win2000Pro . I've set up James Use JDMS
>store mails.
>But when I pop a mail(about 500KB) from localhost, I feel it so slow! Even
>slower than I retrieve a mail from a slow-rate internet .
>Do you have the same feeling?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:james-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:james-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
