That, I believe, is as simple as not requiring the sender to log in and
not requiring the sender to be in the local network either. I
accidentally set up my James configuration like this and found my server
transmitting huge amounts of spam in no time. Often I do not think the
spammers even care to send a probe e-mail to check that the message
arrives. Maybe they just bill the clients for the number of e-mails that
were accepted by the abused servers...

If he is able create some trouble for the spammers in a legal manner I
wish him the best of luck.


Randahl



 

-----Original Message-----
From: bill parducci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 24. februar 2003 16:25
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: Spam Honeypot

Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I was going to say that same thing to him.  In fact, I had written it
in my
> note, but then I saw his comment about sending the mail to null, so I
think
> that he knows not to actually be an open relay.
> 
>       --- Noel

i saw the same. however, how is he going to be an 'open relay' (to
attract spammers) and then be dumping stuff to null?

b


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to