> The major problem proved to be eyesight. > I missed the fine-print about James requiring JVM 1.4...once I upgraded, the > problem 'disappeared'.. so onward again.
What fine-print? I build James using IBM Java v1.3.1, and have tested it with that JVM, too. AFAIK, the Phoenix folks are also supposed to be supporting nothing more than 1.3.1, too. We have not made a decision to require 1.4, although now that the Apache servers are running 1.4 successfully with FreeBSD, one of our reason for not moving forward has been alleviated. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]