Serge Knystautas wrote:
>
> As long as I'm writing, there's a few other things that need to get
> fixed in JAMES. First is it's not explictly putting in Return-Path: and
> Received: headers, which proper SMTP mail servers should. Even if
> you're a relaying server, you should put in the Received header, and the
> Return-Path is just good practice I've seen most mail servers do to help
> prevent spam. I'm working on this now, tryign to get MailHeaders to
> support adding this as well as keeping the mail headers "ordering" that
> InternetAddress has if you construct it normally, but loses if you
> construct it from an InputStream (strange implementation bug, IMHO, but
> I can see the logic of why this is).
I'll work on it.
>
> The other thing is that JAMES is unfortunately adding extra dots to
> emails!!! Not sure if this is from the latest patch to
> CharTerminatedInputStream (?), or maybe the latest avalon just isn't in
> the James tree. In any case, it's somewhat annoying and I can't put it
> into beta use until that's fixed.
I don't have this problem on both my linux and win2000. Can't see where
it is but I can tell you that I didn't change anything in the
CharTerminatedInputStream since many days.
Fede
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
