Serge Knystautas wrote:
>
> Federico Barbieri wrote:
> > Agree that being more coherent with other mail server may be smarter
> > than being closer to specs...
> >
> > +1 for me. Does anybody has better suggestion?
>
> I would suggest the following behavior:
>
> If no Date header, automatically add one with the current date/time.
> If no From header, automatically add one based on MAIL FROM:
> If no To header, either do nothing or add "To: Undisclosed recipients"
+1
Is there any volunteer for implementation? :-)
>
> The first 2 rules help ensure the email can be tracked and makes the
> email a step closer to "compliance." However, I don't think you should
> require a To: header, as people could have sent a message with all
> recipients as BCC'd (so all your friends don't see all the other
> addresses to whom you sent that bad joke).
>
> Serge Knystautas
> Loki Technologies
> http://www.lokitech.com/
>
--
Federico Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
