Federico can speak to this better, but I think POP3 support is still
somewhat experimental (at least I haven't had much success with it
yet). I'm not sure what the differences are between RFC 1725 and 1939,
but most references to POP3 I've seen refer to RFC 1725... either case,
both restrict NOOP commands to functioning during the TRANSACTION state.
(minor fix)
You've reached all the developers by sending a message to this listserv
(personally I work more on the SMTP delivery stuff, when I do work on
James)... it seems you are very well versed with analyzing the problems
and could probably make some patches. ;) Don't support you want to
volunteer? ;)
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
Christophe Marchal wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am a new user of James. I successful install it, and it works very well
> with my Outlook Express.
> But I have also a Web program to check my email with a web browser, and I
> have two little problem :
> - first it say me that the mailserver (James) is not RFC compliant. I
> investigate, and the reason is that the noop command always work with the
> server.
> But the RFC 1939 say that the noop command always work but only when the
> user is log in.
> - If I remove these check the program seems to go on deadlock. The reason
> is that the RFC say that every result of a command ends with a single ".",
> but James serveur ends all with a blank line.
>
> I don't know how to contact the James's developper, so I hope there is one
> on this mailing list.
> It will be very fine if the mail server could be RFC Compliant.
>
> Christophe
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
