Serge Knystautas wrote:
> On a largely unrelated note, right now JAMES allows root/root as an admin
> account. I think I should comment this out so from the fresh build, you
> don't have a security whole open. Someone could look for JAMES servers and
> try root/root and create however many POP3 accounts for themselves if they
> so choose. An alternate approach is to leave the password field blank and
> require someone to fill it in before it can be used... this still requires
> the admin to edit the conf file before logging into the remote admin (I view
> as a good thing), and might encourage them to set their own admin password.
>
I'd suggest leaving them blank.
Charles
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
