Peter Donald wrote:
>
> At 08:19 30/1/01 +0100, Michael Wyraz wrote:
> >> > What's the status of porting to the new avalon?
> >>
> >> The current cvs uses Avalon 3.0a4 with a bug patch.
> >> Avalon 3.1a1 was released yesturday so upgrading is another todo.
> >> (Hopefully not too bad ...)
> >> Will try to do later this week, but can't promise.
> >
> >When will there be a code freeze or a final release of avalon?
>
> The day there is a final version of linux/windows/word or a final version
> of any major software undertaking (as in never).
>
> >Or are you
> >going to port james everytime a new avalon is released? Don't this cost to
> >much time?
>
> Considering the newer versions were architectured to specifically fix
> problems that were experienced with James it would be well worth the "cost"
> as it would be cheaper than James reimplementing the features themselves.
I think upgrading to new Avalon releases will generally be useful for
James as they make it easier to add funcionality.
I think the rate of change of Avalon will slow down, so there should be
less effort for each upgrade.
Charles
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
