-----------------------------
Please read the FAQ!
<http://java.apache.org/faq/>
-----------------------------
> This is most interesting. However, the readme for Apache under windows
> indicates that it is not optimized for NT. Does this mean that Apache
> shouldn't be used under NT (Scott below seems happy with it)? Any
comments?
I am very happy with it. I think the Apache team is just doing a CYA on
their part because almost everyone on the team is a *nix developer. I am
using both Apache 1.3.9 and IIS4 (both almost totally unoptimized), and I am
happy with either (although servlets seem far faster than ASP). The reason
I chose to go the Apache/JServ route is because the cheaper Servlet
implementations (JRun, ServletExec) do NOT support load balancing. Thus
JServ became 'the one'. After reading the 'beta-quality code statement on
the Apache web site, I was fully prepared to move to a Unix variant (and
security concerns (of the application, not the server) may force me too,
anyway). But now I can say that I have no problems with Apache/JServ, with
the exception of fail-over support.
> Also, Scott what Java VM are you using? Actually, we were planning to use
> the same configuration below but was concerned that Apache wasn't
optimized
> for Windows (actually it has been labeled as beta quality in the readme
> file). I would like the Apache/Jserv developers to comment on this?
I am using:
JDK 1.2.2
JSDK 2.0
Apache 1.3.9
Windows NT 4 Service Pack 4
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
