> I didn't yet made performance comparisons, and, for sure, I'm not going
> to officially publish my results, since somehow IBM paid my salary for
> the last 6 months. All I can say is that on Windows NT IBM 118 is faster
> on IO compared to SUN 122, but this one beats the first on computational
> speed... I'll check out the new one as soon as I get back to Italy...
Sounds about right as the IBM vm's have historically had better IO on the
benchmarks.
.duncan
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
