Hi all,
in our testing application using lucene 1.4.3. Thanks you guys for
that great job.
We have index file around 12GiB, one file (merged). To retrieve hits it
takes nice small amount of the time, but reading fields takes 10-100
times more (the stored ones). I think because all the fields are read.
I would like to try implement lucene index files as tables in db with
some lazy fields loading. As I have searched web I have found only impl.
of the store.Directory (bdb), but it only holds data as binary streams.
This technique will be not so helpful because BLOB operations are not
fast performing. On another side I will have a lack of the freedom from
documents fields variability but I can omit a lot of the skipping and
many opened files. Also IndexWriter can have document/term locking
granuality.
So I think that way leads to extends IndexWriter / IndexReader and have
own implementation of index.Segment* classes. It is the best way or I
missing smthg how achieve this?
If it is bad idea, I will be happy to heard another possibilities.
I would like also join development of the lucene. Is there some points
how to start?
Thx for reading this,
sorry if I did some mistakes
Karel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
