[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664?page=comments#action_12431669 ] 
            
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-664:
--------------------------------------

I went through basically the same reasoning that Grant describes, particularly 
with loading the javadocs w/too much stuff. But I do like the wiki ability to 
give you linking akin to that in javadocs.

As to renaming the wiki url (mentioned on dev though not in jira), I'm happy to 
approach infrastructure. My concern would be external links into the wiki that 
reference the old jakarata url. I guess we could find out if they can handle a 
redirect from jakarata-lucene/* to lucene/*?

> [PATCH] small fixes to the new scoring.html doc
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-664
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-664
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Website
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>         Attachments: lucene.uxf, scoring-small-fixes.patch, 
> scoring-small-fixes2.patch, scoring-small-fixes3.patch
>
>
> This is an awesome initiative.  We need more docs that cleanly explain the 
> inner workings of Lucene in general... thanks Grant & Steve & others!
> I have a few small initial proposed fixes, largely just adding some more 
> description around the components of the formula.  But also a couple typos, 
> another link out to Wikipedia, a missing closing ), etc.  I've only made it 
> through the "Understanding the Scoring Formula" section so far.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to