On 12/19/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bingo! :) I'll try the patch shortly and report back in a bit.
Cool, since you can serve as a test-case, I'll hold of on committing until I hear how it works.
What do you think about that alternative approach I mentioned? Instead of having FieldCacheImpl be aware of all IndexReaders, have FieldCache be an inst var in IndexReader?
I wonder why it wasn't done that way to start with.... perhaps to completely separate sorting from index reading. Anyway, it's not backward compatible, and it doesn't buy us much to change now does it? We would get rid of a singe hash lookup on the reader, which is insignificant compared to anything the FieldCache is used for anyway. -Yonik http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
