Just to put in two cents: the Flexible Indexing thread has also
talked about the notion of being able to store arbitrary data at:
token, field, doc and Index level.
-Grant
On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:01 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Michael Busch wrote about "Re: Payloads":
As you pointed out it is still possible to have per-doc payloads. You
need an analyzer which adds just one Token with payload to a specific
field for each doc. I understand that this code would be quite
ugly on
the app side. A more elegant solution might be LUCENE-580. With that
patch you are able to add pre-analyzed fields (i. e. TokenStreams)
to a
Document without having to use an analyzer. You could use a
TokenStream
Thanks, this sounds like a good idea.
In fact, I could live with something even simpler: I want to be able
to create a Field with a single token (with its payload). If I need
more
than one of these tokens with payloads, I can just add several
fields with
the same name (this should work, although the description of
LUCENE-580
suggests that it might have a bug in this area).
I'll add a comment about this use-case to LUCENE-580.
--
Nadav Har'El | Thursday, Jan 18 2007, 28
Tevet 5767
IBM Haifa Research Lab
|-----------------------------------------
|If glory comes after death,
I'm not in a
http://nadav.harel.org.il |hurry. (Latin proverb)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Center for Natural Language Processing
http://www.cnlp.org
Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
