I'm not exactly sure if this is show stopper, but when I get the
binary, the build.xml that is included is not usable b/c it is
missing common-build.xml.
It may not be a big deal, b/c you don't necessarily need to build
anything since it is a binary release, yet, the first thing I tried
was ant -projecthelp
So, +1, but we may want to do something about it for the next release.
Otherwise, I really like how Yonik approached this release by putting
it up in a staging area for us to try out before making it official.
-Grant
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
+1
I pulled down the zip & src zip, was able to build the core/demo jars
from sources, pass all unit tests (clean), and run the
IndexFiles/SearchFiles demos. I also confirmed the md5's & asc's on
all 4.
Mike
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:20:56 -0500, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
Release artifacts for review are at
http://people.apache.org/~yonik/staging_area/lucene/
Please vote to officially release these packages as Lucene 2.1.
-Yonik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Center for Natural Language Processing
http://www.cnlp.org
Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
