Michael Busch wrote on 17/May/2007:
> public static class ExtendedFSDirectory extends FSDirectory {
> ...
> public void flushBuffer(byte[] b, int offset, int size)
> throws IOException {
> if (ExtendedFSDirectory.this.interrupted) {
> throw new IndexWriterInterruptException();
> }
>
> super.flushBuffer(b, offset, size);
> }
>
Steven Parkes wrote on 22/may/2007:
> I think something like what Michael has suggested is a good
> idea, but I would be in favor of putting it in the core,
> rather than making it a derived thing for a single Directory
> implementation. Seems to me like it's a pretty small code
> change for a very nice thing to have. Doesn't seem to add
> much complexity.
I was thinking of how this can be made a "core logic". If we
regard the "shutdown()" op/status as system wide, ie static,
perhaps the shutdown feature can be supported only for
implementations of BufferedIndexOutput?
If so, would it work to check for a shutdown request in
two locations only:
BufferedIndexOutput.writeBytes(byte[],int,int)
BufferedIndexOutput.flush()
Doron
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
