[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517339
 ] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-966:
----------------------------------------

+1 for deprecating StandardAnalyzer, although it is a little weird to have a 
StandardAnalyzer2, which is it the standard or not?  Maybe we could call it the 
DefaultAnalyzer or something like that.  I never much cared for tacking on 
numbers on the end of class names.  

I agree with Mike M's last comment and approach, though, if that proves to be 
the case for the differences.

> A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-966
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Stanislaw Osinski
>             Fix For: 2.3
>
>         Attachments: AnalyzerBenchmark.java, jflex-analyzer-patch.txt, 
> jflex-analyzer-r560135-patch.txt, jflex-analyzer-r561292-patch.txt, 
> jflex-analyzer-r561693-compatibility.txt
>
>
> JFlex (http://www.jflex.de/) can be used to generate a faster (up to several 
> times) replacement for StandardAnalyzer. Will add a patch and a simple 
> benchmark code in a while.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to