Mark -- have you tried the jflex-analyzer-r560135-patch.txt patch with your wikipedia diff test?
That's the early one whose grammar was "dot for dot" translated from the original JavaCC
spec -- for further patches I did some "optimizations", which seem to have broken the
compatibility...
The test is Mike's and I think it is off your latest patch. Looks like
the optimizations might have to go then?
Incidentally, what was the motivation for requiring the <NUM> token to have
numbers only in every second segment and not in any segment?
I don't think the rule is "every second segment" but "at least every
other segment". Why this rule was made, I am not sure; I am guessing it
was just a good rule of thumb to catch a lot of serial numbers, model
numbers, etc but without going too overboard in the matching.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
