[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521201
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-871:
------------------------------------
Not exactly true, Mike. Switch statements are implemented as table lookups
(tableswitch opcode) or binary sort switches (lookupswitch) -- depending on the
sparseness of keys used in the case clauses I'm sure, don't have the time to
dig out my copy of the JVM spec right now.
In any case, I'm pretty sure what Staszek says is correct and will be more
efficient -- I've had that in practice and doing manual lookup instead of a
switch (with multiple branches, wide spectrum) was _much_ faster (an order of
magnitude in my case).
> ISOLatin1AccentFilter a bit slow
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-871
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-871
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Analysis
> Affects Versions: 1.9, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.1, 2.2
> Reporter: Ian Boston
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 2.3
>
> Attachments: fasterisoremove1.patch, fasterisoremove2.patch,
> ISOLatin1AccentFilter.java.patch, LUCENE-871.take4.patch
>
>
> The ISOLatin1AccentFilter is a bit slow giving 300+ ms responses when used in
> a highligher for output responses.
> Patch to follow
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
