On 9/24/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On flushing pending deletes by RAM usage: should we just bundle this > up under "flush by RAM usage"? Ie "when total RAM usage, either from > buffered deletes, buffered docs, anything else, exceeds X then it's > time to flush"? (Instead of having a separate "max RAM usage for > buffered deletes" trigger).
Agree. We don't need a separate ram usage for deletes. Ning --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
