[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12631850#action_12631850
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1314:
------------------------------------------
Hi Michael,
It used to work this patch. It was not easy to implement the first time. I
did a merge of the new code and these are the resulting problems. Do you know
what has changed since 2.3.1? Or around July? I am surprised at some of the
errors as they should be unrelated to how the patch works. I may need to go
ahead and break up the patch into the FieldsReader synchronization optimization
(or is this already in trunk?) in order to isolate the issues. What do you
think?
Jason
> IndexReader.reopen(boolean force)
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1314
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch,
> lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch,
> lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch, lucene-1314.patch,
> lucene-1314.patch
>
>
> Based on discussion
> http://www.nabble.com/IndexReader.reopen-issue-td18070256.html. The problem
> is reopen returns the same reader if there are no changes, so if docs are
> deleted from the new reader, they are also reflected in the previous reader
> which is not always desired behavior.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
